http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/ Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:20:50 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-254 Maximus Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:10:06 +0000 http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/#comment-254 I would like to see a continuation of the topic I would like to see a continuation of the topic

]]> http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-208 brad brisco Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:05:03 +0000 http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/#comment-208 Michael, I think you make a good point about what is in the DNA from the beginning. Michael, I think you make a good point about what is in the DNA from the beginning.

]]> http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-202 Michael Foster Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:45:18 +0000 http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/#comment-202 I still find it strange that we then would be advising folks to start out with a Sr pastor model of government (or lead pastor/planter/guy model but seriously whats the difference? Its merely semantics) and thereby laying this form of DNA into the church which you eventually hope to move against that same DNA into a plurality of elders model. I still find it strange that we then would be advising folks to start out with a Sr pastor model of government (or lead pastor/planter/guy model but seriously whats the difference? Its merely semantics) and thereby laying this form of DNA into the church which you eventually hope to move against that same DNA into a plurality of elders model.

]]> http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-201 everythingisbackwards Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:55:51 +0000 http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/#comment-201 Michael F., They are against church planting teams where you equally share the lead planter role. The consensus is you have to have a lead guy. If you plant as a team, have a lead guy that can pull rank if necessary, and make sure the #2 person is the right person. And make sure he knows that he's not the lead planter. Role clarity was most strongly emphasized. This was not so much talked about by Driscoll and Stetzer but from other guys at the boot camp. Michael F., They are against church planting teams where you equally share the lead planter role. The consensus is you have to have a lead guy. If you plant as a team, have a lead guy that can pull rank if necessary, and make sure the #2 person is the right person. And make sure he knows that he’s not the lead planter. Role clarity was most strongly emphasized. This was not so much talked about by Driscoll and Stetzer but from other guys at the boot camp.

]]> http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-200 Michael Foster Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:14:58 +0000 http://blog.dmichaelclary.com/2007/09/21/driscoll-and-stetzer-on-church-planting-partners/#comment-200 I would of plant "team-style" if the option would of presented itself. Did they give any positives of team planting? I would of plant “team-style” if the option would of presented itself. Did they give any positives of team planting?

]]>